On Constructive Cut Admissibility in Deduction Modulo

نویسندگان

  • Richard Bonichon
  • Olivier Hermant
چکیده

Deduction modulo is a theoretical framework which allows the introduction of computational steps in deductive systems. This approach is well suited to automated theorem proving. We describe a proofsearch method based upon tableaux for Gentzen’s intuitionistic LJ extended with rewrite rules on propositions and terms . We prove its completeness with respect to Kripke structures. Then we give a soundness proof with respect to cut-free LJ modulo. This yields a constructive proof of semantic cut elimination, which we use to characterize the relation between tableaux methods and cut elimination in the intuitionistic case.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Regaining cut admissibility in deduction modulo using abstract completion

Deduction modulo is a way to combine computation and deduction in proofs, by applying the inference rules of a deductive system (e.g. natural deduction or sequent calculus) modulo some congruence that we assume here to be presented by a set of rewrite rules. Using deduction modulo is equivalent to proving in a theory corresponding to the rewrite rules, and leads to proofs that are often shorter...

متن کامل

Consistency Implies Cut Admissibility

For any finite and consistent first-order theory, we can find a presentation as a rewriting system that enjoys cut admissibility. Since proofs are rarely built without context, it is essential to develop methods that are adapted to search for proofs in theories. For instance, SMT provers provide efficient tools. Nevertheless, they are restricted to some particular theories, such as linear arith...

متن کامل

Cut Elimination in Deduction Modulo by Abstract Completion (Full Version)

Deduction Modulo implements Poincaré’s principle by identifying deduction and computation as different paradigms and making their interaction possible. This leads to logical systems like the sequent calculus or natural deduction modulo. Even if deduction modulo is logically equivalent to first-order logic, proofs in such systems are quite different and dramatically simpler with one cost: cut el...

متن کامل

Représentation et interaction des preuves en superdéduction modulo. (Representation and interaction of proofs in superdeduction modulo)

In this thesis we propose and study several deduction systems that mix deduc-tion and computation. Deduction modulo proposes to translate a computational po-wer through a rewriting system. We present the dual concept called superdeduction.It translates a deductive power into custom inference rules that enri the deduc-tion system. ese computational and deductive powers modify t...

متن کامل

Cut Admissibility by Saturation

Deduction modulo is a framework in which theories are integrated into proof systems such as natural deduction or sequent calculus by presenting them using rewriting rules. When only terms are rewritten, cut admissibility in those systems is equivalent to the confluence of the rewriting system, as shown by Dowek, RTA 2003, LNCS 2706. This is no longer true when considering rewriting rules involv...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006